Mothers, fashion, and other stories
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2883e/2883eedffdbd32b7ee76dcf4f90ef4a00ca05e24" alt=""
An interesting fashion exhibition titled M&Others, dedicated to the complex theme of fashion and motherhood, is open from June 14, 2024, to January 6, 2025, at the Fashion Museum in the Belgian city of Hasselt (Modemuseum Hasselt), which is just about an hour’s drive or train ride from Brussels. The occasion for the exhibition was the grand Marian celebration in honor of Hasselt’s patron saint, the Virgin Mary – the Jesse Tree (Virga Jesse), which was held from August 11 to 25, 2024. This celebration has been taking place in Hasselt every seven years for 340 years, with a painted, wooden Gothic statue of the Virgin Mary from the 14th century, kept in the local basilica, at its center. The inspiration fashion designers draw from faith, sacred art, and the Virgin Mary as the ideal woman and mother is evidenced by selected runway models displayed at the exhibition. Among them are models from Jean Paul Gaultier’s iconic spring collection for 2007 with striking quotes from Catholic visual art, as well as a model from the popular Dolce & Gabbana Tailored Mosaic collection for 2013, based on motifs from Byzantine-style mosaics in the cathedral of Monreale in Sicily. The exhibition, curated by Eve Demoen, traces the attitude towards the cultural identity of mothers, which has gained increasing importance in society and fashion since 1900. In addition to dresses and corsets from the 19th century, designed to conceal changes in the body of the expectant mother, the exhibition also features the cover of Vanity Fair magazine from August 1991, with a nude photograph of actress Demi Moore in her seventh month of pregnancy, taken by famous American photographer Annie Leibovitz. Starting from the cult of the Virgin Mary and European bourgeois culture, this dynamic exhibition reaches to contemporary fashion experiments and controversies with various social stereotypes related to the female body. After giving birth to her daughter Marguerite in 1895 at the age of thirty, fashion designer Jeanne Lanvin began designing children’s clothing. In 1908, she opened a children’s department in her fashion house, and in 1909, a department for mothers and daughters, where mothers could buy complementary clothing for themselves and their little girls. In recent decades, this concept of dressing mothers and daughters has been trending as Mini Me. On the other hand, the symbolic fashion mother Madeleine Vionnet is presented at the exhibition with a branching installation that shows her great influence on both contemporaries and fashion designers of future generations. In addition to creating new canons of female elegance by liberating the female body from corsets, Vionnet, whose fashion house operated intermittently from 1912 to 1940, gave her employees maternity leave and provided daycare for their children. Many famous fashion designers were influenced by the personality and style of their own mothers. Christian Dior kept a photograph of his mother Madeleine Dior on his desk, wearing a dress with a narrow waist, following the Belle Époque fashion. As a homage to Madeleine, the narrow waist became characteristic of Dior’s New Look, launched in 1947. Dior also found inspiration in memories of colors in the interior of his childhood home in Granville, Normandy, where the Christian Dior Museum (Musée Christian Dior) is now located, as well as in various types of flowers in the home garden that his mother carefully tended. The exhibition also showcases paper dolls for dressing that Yves Saint Laurent made at the age of 17, modeled after the fashionable clothes from his mother’s wardrobe. In numerous stories about mothers, maternal figures, and fashion, of which only a few are briefly told in this blog, classic Hermès bags Birkin and Kelly have also found their place. On a flight from Paris to London in 1984, actress Jane Birkin complained to Jean-Louis Dumas, president and artistic director of the Hermès fashion house, that she couldn’t find a bag that would meet all her needs as a mother. Dumas soon devised a solution in the form of a spacious, functional rectangular bag. This Hermès model, which even contained pockets for baby bottles, is now known as the Birkin. Another luxury Hermès bag, the Kelly, entered fashion history in 1956 when Grace Kelly, Princess of Monaco, tried to use it to conceal her pregnant belly from intrusive paparazzi. Dictionary of less familiar terms: Jesse Tree — a scene typical of Eastern and Western Christian art, depicting the body of the sleeping Jesse, father of the prophet David, from which a vine grows upward with figures of Jesse’s descendants and Christ’s ancestors on its branches, and at the very top, the Virgin Mary with Christ. With the words But a shoot shall sprout from the stump of Jesse, and from his roots a bud shall blossom (Isaiah 11:1), the prophet Isaiah foretold Christ’s birth in the Old Testament, which is why the Jesse Tree is also one of the names for the Virgin Mary. A well-known representation of the Jesse Tree is in the Visoki Dečani Monastery near Peć, created around 1338–1348. The Jesse Tree became a model for family trees. 1. Virgin Mary – Tree of Jesse (Virga Jesse), 14th century; the basilica in Hasselt; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0 / photo: Kris Van de Sande Exhibition M&Others, Modemuseum Hasselt, 10 September 2024; photo: D. Maskareli Exhibition M&Others, Modemuseum Hasselt, 10 September 2024; photo: D. Maskareli Exhibition M&Others, Modemuseum Hasselt, 10 September 2024; photo: D. Maskareli Exhibition M&Others, Modemuseum Hasselt, 10 September 2024; photo: D. Maskareli
Summer, Art and Fashion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7487f/7487f207dee976eff2dba25ed7a3723b5fdaa92a" alt=""
For a long time, summer has been an inspiration not only for fashion designers but also for other visual artists, while sunny, warm, and long summer days demand serious fashion preparations from us, regardless of whether we spend them at work or on vacation. Carefully selected, practical, and quality summer clothing will make us elegant and trendy during numerous and diverse summer activities, but also feel comfortable, confident, and at ease. As a season of travel, exploration, and new experiences, summer is a good occasion to look back at some of the iconic representations of this season in art, which indicate the importance of fashion in the life of modern man. In his essay “The Painter of Modern Life,” published in the Figaro newspaper in 1863, poet and art critic Charles Baudelaire expressed the view that fashion is an important expression of modernity, criticizing contemporary artists for dressing their figures in clothes of the past. James Tissot, a painter, illustrator, and caricaturist known for his realistic portraits and genre scenes, is one of the artists influenced by Baudelaire. As the son of a textile merchant and a milliner, Tissot developed a sense for clothing details during his upbringing, to which he paid special attention. It is known that this artist had a rich assortment of dresses in his studio in which he painted his models, and that he depicted the same dress multiple times. One of the recognizable garments in Tissot’s paintings is a white summer afternoon dress made of muslin, decorated with ruffles and yellow bows, in line with the fashion of the 1870s. In the compositions “Summer” (1876), “Officer and Ladies on the Deck of HMS Calcutta” (c. 1876), and “Spring” (c. 1878), this dress is accompanied by appropriate fashion accessories such as a hat, parasol, or fan. In the second half of the 19th century, the Impressionist movement in art celebrated the beauty of the moment and everyday life. Summer and fashion often appear as themes in the works of the Impressionists. Claude Monet painted several summer genre scenes known as “Woman with a Parasol.” One of them is “Woman with a Parasol – Madame Monet and Her Son” (1875), which was painted in Argenteuil. The painting depicts Monet’s first wife Camille, walking with their son Jean on a windy summer day. In addition to the white summer dress, Camille wears a hat with a veil fluttering in the wind and an open green parasol, a common fashion accessory at the time. Following Monet’s example, the motif of an open parasol would later appear in the paintings of John Singer Sargent, a portraitist who used clothing as a powerful tool for expressing personality and identity in visual art. In the famous painting “Luncheon of the Boating Party” (1880–1881), Pierre-Auguste Renoir depicted a group of his friends, members of Parisian high society. An important part of this scene, set on the banks of the Seine, on the terrace of the Maison Fournaise restaurant near Paris, is the diverse male and female, formal and informal clothing: classic men’s suits with top hats and bowler hats, sportswear with straw hats, as well as modern women’s clothing – dresses with ruffles and lace worn with imaginative hats decorated with flowers and ribbons. Among the personalities depicted in the painting is Aline Charigot, a seamstress, Renoir’s model and future wife, who sits at the table with her dog in the lower left corner. Besides Renoir’s “Luncheon of the Boating Party,” one of the most popular representations of summer and fashion in art is Georges Seurat’s painting “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” (1884). This Neo-Impressionist painting was done in the technique of Pointillism, which involves applying colors to the painting surface in short strokes (dots) to create the illusion of whole forms in the viewer’s eye. Among the clothing of various layers of Parisian society in the park on the island of La Grande Jatte, women’s clothing from the bustle fashion period, which lasted during the 1870s and 1880s, attracts special attention. The striking silhouettes of the bustles, supports that widened the skirt in the back, give Seurat’s complex painting the quality of an interesting fashion testimony. James Tissot, Summer, 1876; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain / Tate Britain James Tissot, Spring, 1878; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain Claude Monet, Woman with a Parasol – Madame Monet and Her Son, 1875; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain / National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Luncheon of the Boating Party, 1880–1881; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain / The Phillips Collection Georges Seurat, A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, 1884; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain / Art Institute of Chicago
Medal-worthy style: a brief history of Olympic fashion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18fb4/18fb48d7f49125057f1bd1ead8b90f413702e08b" alt=""
From July 26 to August 11, 2024, Paris, one of the world’s fashion, art, and style capitals, will host the Olympic Games for the third time. An important part of the visual identity of this major international sporting event, which brings together athletes, audiences, numerous staff, officials, and media teams, are the recognizable Olympic uniforms. Beyond their primary function of providing comfort, mobility, and protection, these uniforms serve as a means of visual communication, marking not only national identity but also the roles of different participants in the protocol and competitive aspects of the Games. They also reflect current trends in the sportswear industry, moral codes of the time, budget constraints, and various national branding strategies. In the early Olympic Games, participants wore their own sports equipment and clothing, which led to the introduction of clothing in specific colors and markings such as badges or armbands for easier identification. The development of ceremonial practices directly influenced the design of Olympic uniforms. At the opening of the London 1908 Olympics, the Parade of Nations, a march of national teams, was held for the first time, becoming one of the most recognizable Olympic traditions. At the Parade of Nations in Paris in 1924, many participants appeared in national uniforms, contributing to the visual dynamism of this event, which has since become a kind of visual and fashion spectacle. With the strengthening of media influence after World War II, various authors began writing the history of Olympic fashion. One of them was French fashion designer André Courrèges, who designed the uniforms for the staff of the 1972 Munich Olympics. To distance themselves from the 1936 Berlin Olympics, held under the shadow of the Nazi regime, the organizers wanted to give the Munich event a relaxed and informal character. Their requirement was that the uniforms be inspired by Bavarian folklore and safari style, with a defined color palette that included light blue, green, lavender, orange, and silver gray. Considering these guidelines, Courrèges designed practical clothing that included overalls, baseball caps, mini skirts, and jackets. This clothing is also remembered because it was worn by the future Queen Silvia of Sweden, who met her husband, then Crown Prince and now King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden, as a hostess in Munich. Among the designers of Olympic uniforms over time have been names like Ralph Lauren, Giorgio Armani, Issey Miyake, and Christian Louboutin. For the London 2012 Olympics, Stella McCartney designed the entire Olympic collection for the Great Britain team. On that occasion, she stated that the competitive uniforms were a bigger challenge for her than the ceremonial ones. The deconstructed Union Jack motif she used in 2012 was criticized for being too blue. Therefore, for the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics, she chose a heraldic design with floral emblems of the four British nations, the Latin motto “Iuncti in Uno” (Joined in One), and the GB logo. Besides comfort and practicality, Stella McCartney’s Olympic uniforms are characterized by bold graphic prints, colors, and inspiration from British heritage. Presentations of the Olympic uniforms of participating countries’ teams traditionally attract attention in the weeks leading up to the opening of the Games. At the 2024 Paris Olympics, the French team will appear at the Parade of Nations in uniforms by the brand Berluti. The design of these dark blue suits, modern versions of tuxedos, embodies elegance and sophistication as synonyms for the host country’s style. Serbian Olympians will defend their national colors in Paris in uniforms by the brand PEAK. The design of the Olympic collection for Team Serbia is based on the colors of the national flag – red, blue, and white – but also on symbols, notably the cross as a universal symbol of faith, hope, love, and victory. Poster for the fencing events at the 1900 World Fair and Summer Olympics in Paris; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain S. Olympic swimming team at the Paris Olympics 1924; photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain Clothes of the volunteers at the Munich Olympics 1972; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 1.0 / User: H-stt Parade of Nations at the London Olympics 2012; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 2.0 / Department for Culture, Media and Sport Athletes from Serbia at the opening of the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 2.0 / Jude Freeman
Fashion, Identity, and Culture of Living in Belgrade in the 19th and Early 20th Century: Religious Holidays and Balls
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8f40/c8f406cf469998cb5eeb37f4527df44c40788d8d" alt=""
During the 19th century, social life in Belgrade developed intensively. A popular form of social gathering was women’s posela, which had been held since the late 1830s. The first posela were organized by Marija Milutinović, known as Maca Punktatorka, the wife of the poet Sima Milutinović – Sarajlija, and later by Anka Konstantinović, the daughter of Jevrem Obrenović, brother of Prince Miloš. At these gatherings, various women’s topics were discussed, with fashion occupying an important place. Additionally, the gathered women were introduced to European culture, advised on child-rearing and home decoration, and discussed various daily events. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, such gatherings became known as žurevi. This term originated from the French term jour fixe, which denoted a fixed day of the week when the hostess would receive her friends. An indispensable part of life in Belgrade also became various sports activities. On the city’s streets, especially on the Promenade in Knez Miloš Street, men and women could be seen riding horses recreationally. Among the first women to engage in this sport were the daughters of Prince Aleksandar Karađorđević. They rode on side-saddles, wearing half-cylinders on their heads and boots. The first horse races in Belgrade were organized in 1863 by Prince Mihailo Obrenović, who was himself an excellent rider and a great lover of equestrian sports. In Belgrade, fencing and shooting, as well as gymnastics and martial arts, also developed. The fencing society “Serbian Sword” was founded in 1897, and in 1906, the football club of the same name was founded. The football club “Soko” was established in 1903, and BSK (Belgrade Sports Club) in 1911, while the First Serbian Society for Gymnastics and Wrestling was founded as early as 1857 by painter Steva Todorović. In the last decades of the 19th century, recreational sports such as cycling, ice skating, tennis, and swimming emerged. The first Serbian cycling society was founded in 1884. This society also had its own ice rink, located where the Army House stands today. A reporter from the newspaper Politika noted in January 1905 at the ice rink of the First Serbian Cycling Society that male and female skaters were not dressed as they should be, recommending cycling attire for men and the shortest possible skirts for women, noting that this was not shameful since in America and England, women already wore such skirts on the streets, and no one laughed at them. During the summer months, excursions were an important part of city life. Wealthier citizens temporarily moved to their summer houses in Topčider, and traveled to some resort or spa, while excursions to the city’s surroundings were a pleasant summer pastime available to the broader population. Popular excursion spots around Belgrade were Topčider and Košutnjak. The Austro-Hungarian travel writer Felix Kanitz recorded that especially on Sundays and holidays, /…/ the shady paths leading from the railway station to the restaurants were covered with crowds of cheerful people and that people preferred to stop in the wooded corner around Hajdučka Česma. Excursions were an opportunity not only to rest from daily obligations but also for more casual attire, suited to outdoor activities. In a group photograph of excursionists in the vicinity of Belgrade, from the collection of the Museum of Applied Arts, taken around 1900 by the famous photographer Milan Jovanović, a rich assortment of various men’s and women’s hats is documented. While women, in accordance with the fashion of that time, wore striking and decorated hats, on the heads of men we can see almost all types of men’s headgear characteristic of the 19th and early 20th century: fez, top hat, bowler hat, homburg, fedora, boater, and caps worn as part of a uniform. Although the lawyer and politician Dimitrije Marinković noted in his memoirs that in the mid-19th century, the fez was not considered unusual, while men’s hats at that time, and later, were very rare, by the beginning of the 20th century, the hat had become an indispensable detail in men’s attire. Dictionary of less known terms: Epitaphios – a religious textile with embroidered or painted images showing the body of Christ immediately after being taken down from the cross Tepeluk (tr. tepelik) – a shallow women’s cap made of red cloth and decorated with pearl embroidery, worn as a part of Serbian national costume Bajader – a long and wide patterned silk sash with fringes, worn as a part of Serbian national costume Slava-celebrating family, Belgrade, 1859; source: Kanic, F. (1989), Srbija : zemlja i stanovništvo od rimskog doba do kraja XIX veka, prva knjiga, Beograd, Srpska književna zadruga. Walking and visiting dress; Nedelja, Belgrade, 21 February 1910 Spring children’s dress; Nedelja, Belgrade, 7 February 1910 Walking dress for grown-up girls; Nedelja, Belgrade, 14 February 1910 Modern ball dress and newest spring dress, style “Directoire”; Nedelja, Belgrade, 21 February 1910
Fashion, Identity, and Lifestyle in Belgrade in the 19th and Early 20th Century: Gatherings, Sports, Recreation, and Excursions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64d5f/64d5f7e8bc290b50ea447ee4c1fa8368edbea7b8" alt=""
During the 19th century, social life in Belgrade developed intensively. A popular form of social gathering was women’s posela, which had been held since the late 1830s. The first posela were organized by Marija Milutinović, known as Maca Punktatorka, the wife of the poet Sima Milutinović – Sarajlija, and later by Anka Konstantinović, the daughter of Jevrem Obrenović, brother of Prince Miloš. At these gatherings, various women’s topics were discussed, with fashion occupying an important place. Additionally, the gathered women were introduced to European culture, advised on child-rearing and home decoration, and discussed various daily events. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, such gatherings became known as žurevi. This term originated from the French term jour fixe, which denoted a fixed day of the week when the hostess would receive her friends. An indispensable part of life in Belgrade also became various sports activities. On the city’s streets, especially on the Promenade in Knez Miloš Street, men and women could be seen riding horses recreationally. Among the first women to engage in this sport were the daughters of Prince Aleksandar Karađorđević. They rode on side-saddles, wearing half-cylinders on their heads and boots. The first horse races in Belgrade were organized in 1863 by Prince Mihailo Obrenović, who was himself an excellent rider and a great lover of equestrian sports. In Belgrade, fencing and shooting, as well as gymnastics and martial arts, also developed. The fencing society “Serbian Sword” was founded in 1897, and in 1906, the football club of the same name was founded. The football club “Soko” was established in 1903, and BSK (Belgrade Sports Club) in 1911, while the First Serbian Society for Gymnastics and Wrestling was founded as early as 1857 by painter Steva Todorović. In the last decades of the 19th century, recreational sports such as cycling, ice skating, tennis, and swimming emerged. The first Serbian cycling society was founded in 1884. This society also had its own ice rink, located where the Army House stands today. A reporter from the newspaper Politika noted in January 1905 at the ice rink of the First Serbian Cycling Society that male and female skaters were not dressed as they should be, recommending cycling attire for men and the shortest possible skirts for women, noting that this was not shameful since in America and England, women already wore such skirts on the streets, and no one laughed at them. During the summer months, excursions were an important part of city life. Wealthier citizens temporarily moved to their summer houses in Topčider, and traveled to some resort or spa, while excursions to the city’s surroundings were a pleasant summer pastime available to the broader population. Popular excursion spots around Belgrade were Topčider and Košutnjak. The Austro-Hungarian travel writer Felix Kanitz recorded that especially on Sundays and holidays, /…/ the shady paths leading from the railway station to the restaurants were covered with crowds of cheerful people and that people preferred to stop in the wooded corner around Hajdučka Česma. Excursions were an opportunity not only to rest from daily obligations but also for more casual attire, suited to outdoor activities. In a group photograph of excursionists in the vicinity of Belgrade, from the collection of the Museum of Applied Arts, taken around 1900 by the famous photographer Milan Jovanović, a rich assortment of various men’s and women’s hats is documented. While women, in accordance with the fashion of that time, wore striking and decorated hats, on the heads of men we can see almost all types of men’s headgear characteristic of the 19th and early 20th century: fez, top hat, bowler hat, homburg, fedora, boater, and caps worn as part of a uniform. Although the lawyer and politician Dimitrije Marinković noted in his memoirs that in the mid-19th century, the fez was not considered unusual, while men’s hats at that time, and later, were very rare, by the beginning of the 20th century, the hat had become an indispensable detail in men’s attire. Skating rink of the First Serbian Cycling Association, 1900s; photo: the collection of Miloš Jurišić Cyclist, 1900s; photo: the collection of Miloš Jurišić People on a side trip in Košutnjak, Belgrade, 1913; photo: the collection of Miloš Jurišić People on a side trip on the lake in Kijevo, Belgrade, 1909; photo: the collection of Miloš Jurišić Milan Jovanović, Group portrait of people on a side trip, Beograd, oko 1900; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0 RS DEED / Museum of Applied Art in Belgrade / user: Gmihail
Women’s Urban Dress and National Costume in Serbia in the 19th Century
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/281a8/281a8c045425a6fdf4a265657964670514467351" alt=""
During the first decades of the 19th century, the appearance of urban dress in Serbia was fully harmonized with the Ottoman-Balkan cultural model and the shared visual culture of the inhabitants of Ottoman cities. In the book Putešestvije po Serbiji (Travels in Serbia), Joakim Vujić described in detail the dress of the urban population, that he saw during his visit to Belgrade in 1826. In the illustration of Grigorije H. J. Vujić in the same book, you can see men’s, women’s, and children’s clothing, significantly different from what we recognize today as the Serbian urban dress and national costume of the 19th century. The dominant element of this dress pattern is the anterija (Turkish: entari), a distinctive long dress open in the front, which was worn both by men and women throughout the Ottoman Empire over wide, baggy trousers – dimije (Turkish: şalvar). After the end of the uprising period, and especially after gaining autonomy in 1830, the pluralism of cultural models came to the fore in the Principality of Serbia. At that time, the national costume was created by selecting characteristic garments from the dress inventory of the urban population, living in formerly Ottoman cities. The process unfolded parallelly with the establishment of the European fashion system and the new bourgeois elite perceived the constructed national costume as authentically national dress, which is why it was often used in family portraits as a visual marker of identity. Family portraits were gradually introduced into Serbian bourgeois culture from the end of the 18th century in the Habsburg Monarchy while the citizens of the Principality of Serbia adopted the practice of owning family portraits at the beginning of the 19th century, adapting their iconography to the needs and ideas of their own milieu. In public and private collections, numerous portraits have been preserved to this day, which were an indispensable part of the urban interior, and emphasized the social status of the persons depicted. The basic variant of the women’s national costume consisted of a fistan – a long dress, cut at the waist, with a characteristic heart-shaped neckline, then a shirt, a scarf to cover the chest, a bayader – a wide, patterned silk belt, libade – a short jacket with wide sleeves, as well as a headdress – fez and tepeluk. As a newly formed dress of the elite social class and a costume type imprinted with a national character, it appears in the official portraits of Princesses Ljubica Obrenović and Persida Karađorđević. Speaking about Princess Ljubica’s dress, the German travel writer Otto Dubislav Pirch stated in 1829 that it can be even plainer than that of other urban women, the only difference being beautiful sable fur and a brilliant in her hair. British admiral Adolphus Slade says that during the meeting, in 1838, the princess was dressed in the Greek style, in a fur jacket, cloak, and with a turban on her head. The brilliant in her hair particularly stood out as part of the headdress of Princess Persida’s rich urban dress. The large and expensive brooch of flower bouquet – grana, which decorated her headband – bareš, resembled a diadem. The richness of the princess’s costume is also shown by her portrait from the collection of the National Museum of Serbia, the work of Katarina Ivanović from 1846–1847. In the visual representation of members of Serbian ruling and bourgeois families, we often find elements of the national costume combined with modern clothing. In the official portrait, painted around 1865, Princess Julija Obrenović is shown, in accordance with current European fashion trends, in a dress with crinoline, with which she wears libade and tepeluk. Also, in 1881, Carl Goebel painted Princess Natalija Obrenović, dressed in a luxurious dress with a bustle, combined with parts of the national costume. The first portrait is kept today in the National Museum of Serbia, and the second in the Museum of the City of Belgrade. It is common for family photos from the last decades of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century to show married couples dressed in such a way that the woman wears a variation of the national costume while the man wears a modern men’s suit. From the traditional elements of the national costume, which were worn in combination with modern dresses of European cut, the libade and tepeluk persisted the longest in the women’s clothing inventory. The French Slavic scholar Louis Léger recorded in 1873 that the embroidery on the libade and the pearl on the fez [tepeluk] were left […] until now as a legacy to the female members of the family and they passed from the mother’s wardrobe to the daughter’s outfit. Léger also states that he saw people wearing pearls worth one hundred ducats on their fez. Pavle Vasić, Men’s and women’s dress in Belgrade, after Grigorije H. J. Vujić; photo: private owner/author’s archives Jacket – libade, National Museum Kruševac; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED / National Museum Kruševac / user: Ioannes2909 Cap – tepeluk and headband – bareš, the second half of the 19th century, Museum of Applied Art, Belgrade; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED / Museum of Applied Art in Belgrade Uroš Knežević, Princess Ljubica Obrenović, before 1855, National Museum of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain Katarina Ivanović, Princess Persida Karađorđević, 1846–1847, National Museum of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain
Clothing and Rulers’ Representation: Prince Miloš Obrenović
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13561/13561cdf59402d1a06b84201013761bc7ea3b70b" alt=""
In different areas and different cultures, clothes have been used for centuries as a means of expressing social status. In the 19th century, during the dynamic period of building a modern state, according to social and political circumstances, as well as the models of Ottoman and European rulers’ representation, clothes were successfully and prudently used by the Serbian uprising leader and prince Miloš Obrenović. After the end of the Second Serbian Uprising in 1817, Prince Miloš, in a Turkish dress with a çalma on his head and yemeni on his feet, looked more like a wealthy saraf or merchant than a political representative of the Serbian people, writes historian Mihailo Gavrilović. We see this way of dressing in one of the prince’s canonical portraits, which is known as Prince Miloš with a turban. This portrait, today in the National Museum of Serbia, was painted in 1824 in Kragujevac by Pavel Đurković. At that time, a Kashmir shawl with a distinctive striped and floral pattern, wrapped around the head like a turban, together with a red upper dress whose edges are trimmed with fur and embroidered with metal thread, was a typical element of the luxurious clothing of wealthy Christians in the Ottoman Balkans that expressed their desire to equate their status with the ruling classes through visual code. In the same year, Đurković painted two more portraits of the prince, in which he is shown in a simpler, folk dress, with a fez on his head. In a Turkish dress, Prince Miloš attended the great public ceremony of reading Hatt-i sharif and berat, which was held in Belgrade, on Tašmajdan, in 1830. Since Sultan Mahmud II with these documents granted autonomy to the Principality of Serbia and declared Miloš the hereditary prince, the prince adapted his clothes to the new situation. In the period after 1830, the most common representational dress of Prince Miloš was a dolman made of red cloth, decorated with embroidery with metal thread and cords, with which he wore a kalpak made of fur with an aigrette. Photographer and lithographer Anastas Jovanović noted that the prince said that the Serbs were dressed like that during the old times. During the first reign of Prince Miloš, Novine srpske in their reports also marked this dress as an old Serbian dress. The complete look of the dress can be seen on several preserved portraits of Prince Miloš, among which is the one from the collection of the National Museum of Serbia, the work of Moritz Daffinger from around 1848. Also, Prince Miloš’s sumptuous red dolman is preserved in the collection of the Historical Museum of Serbia, along with about sixty other clothing items that belonged to members of the Obrenović dynasty. The fact that it is sewn by the high standards of men’s tailoring certainly contributes to the representational quality of Miloš’s dolman. Historian Radoš Ljušić states that at the wedding of Prince Mihailo in Vienna in 1853, the old prince attracted significantly more attention than the younger prince and that he made his way through the huge mass of the curious Viennese world, dressed in a luxurious and rich Serbian dress, like some old Serbian knight. Old Serbian dress – dolman was worn by the prince on various solemn occasions. One of them was the ceremony of awarding the Great Order of Sultan Mahmud II (Nişan-ı Zişan), which was held in Bregovo on Timok in 1834. Novine srpske reported that the prince was dressed in a Russian uniform during the bestowing of the order, which showed his respect and devotion to the Russian emperor as the patron of Serbia, but also to the Russian court and its institutions. The next day, when he visited Vizier Hussein Pasha, who had previously ceremoniously presented him with the order, he was dressed in an old cherry-colored Serbian dress, with a sable kalpak on his head. The Russian uniform, which is mentioned in the report from Bregovo, represents another important model of Prince Miloš’s clothing in the period after the acquisition of autonomy in 1830. By wearing a black military jacket with general epaulette and rank on the collar and cuffs according to the Russian model, the prince emphasized his position and autonomy of Serbia in relation to the supreme Ottoman authority. In the Russian uniform, also worn by his brothers Jovan and Jevrem, he is shown in the portrait of Uroš Knežević from 1835, preserved in the collection of the Historical Museum of Serbia. Dictionary of less known terms: Pavel Djurković, Prince Miloš with a turban, 1824, National Museum of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain / National Museum of Serbia Pavel Djurković, Prince Miloš with a fez, 1824, National Museum of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain / National Museum of Serbia Moritz Daffinger, Prince Miloš, around 1848, National Museum of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain / National Museum of Serbia Anastas Jovanović, Prince Miloš Obrenović, 1852, National Library of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain / National Library of Serbia Uroš Knežević, Prince Miloš, 1835–1840, Historical Museum of Serbia; photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain / Historical Museum of Serbia / user: Sadko
How did the women’s handbag become an important fashion accessory?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dc0c/1dc0cafd298dd4146fbb5bfe876553cbcbe4d419" alt=""
From the earliest times, handbags have been a useful addition to clothing worn by both men and women. The emergence of the modern handbag throughout history was preceded by a series of different types, from medieval pouches worn on belts, through 18th-century pockets, bags for carrying books and needlework supplies, to pouches for small change. The development of the handbag as we know it today was greatly influenced by the emancipation of women in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Increased mobility of women and their more significant participation in the business world led to the emergence of various types of handbags, from travel and business bags to daytime handbags and elegant evening bags. An important part of the history of handbags is their contents, which have changed over time. Money, makeup, and tissues have remained in handbags to this day, while needlework supplies disappeared along with the disappearance of this activity from women’s social lives. Over time, new items have made their way into handbags: credit cards have joined metal and paper currency, the range of makeup has increased, and cloth handkerchiefs, hand-decorated with embroidery, have replaced packaged disposable paper tissues. The former place of needlework supplies has been taken over by various electronic devices such as mobile phones and tablets, while cigarettes, which entered women’s handbags in the 1920s as an expression of the struggle for equality, have been removed from them in recent decades, following current trends in healthy living. Unlike shoes, which gradually take on the shape of the wearer’s foot, a handbag becomes a projection of personality by the way it is used. Thus, psychoanalyst Adam Phillips observes that what we say when we talk about handbags – especially when considering them from a historical or aesthetic standpoint – can blur their intimate dimension. Fashion journalist Anna Johnson sees the handbag as an intimate extension of the body, a little house for living on the move, or a portable boudoir full of lipsticks and hairpins, while curator Claire Wilcox emphasizes the dual function of the handbag, which simultaneously reveals and conceals, managing to be both public and private. Therefore, the handbag is the only fashion item where both the exterior and interior are equally important. Surely each of us has at least several times, after carefully examining the interior of a handbag that initially appealed to us, given up on purchasing it, concluding that it is not a place where we can adequately accommodate a portable part of our personal world. The women’s handbag developed in the last third of the 19th century from leather travel bags with handles, metal clasps, and internal compartments. Leather handbags became a mandatory fashion accessory that women wore outside the home, with daytime attire – long jackets, skirts, and large hats. At the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century, various types of evening handbags also became fashionable. Among them were clutch bags, shaped like pouches, often made of the same material as the corresponding evening dress. At that time, compact silver bags decorated with engraved ornaments were also worn, as well as leather cases for opera glasses. Despite their small dimensions, the interior of these handbags had a complex structure, which included a whole range of different compartments, among which were compartments for small change and a mirror, while in opera glass bags, in addition to a compartment for the glasses themselves, there was also space for a fan, a powder puff, a note card, and a pencil. In the dress of the modern woman, the handbag represents an important fashion accessory, and among the most famous handbag manufacturers today are brands such as Hermès, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Gucci, and Bottega Veneta. Some of the classic handbag models, such as Chanel’s 2.55 bag or Hermès’ Birkin and Kelly bags, have remained in fashion for decades. While the iconic Hermès models are named after actresses Jane Birkin and Grace Kelly, the luxury Jodie bag from the Bottega Veneta brand is named after actress Jodie Foster. When making this bag, a technique of weaving leather strips called intrecciato is used, which represents the brand’s recognizable pattern. Draginja Maskareli Museum Consultant – Art and Fashion Historian Images: Handbag, Florence, around 1450, Textile Museum (Museo del tessuto), Prato; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Pockets, 1796, Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum, New York; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC0 1.0 DEED Silver handbag, around 1890; Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA); photo: Wikimedia Commons / public domain Fashion illustration, Journal des dames et des modes magazine, 1912; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC0 1.0 DEED / Rijksmuseum Fashion illustration, Journal des dames et des modes magazine, 1913; photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC0 1.0 DEED / Rijksmuseum
Fashion Icons of the Past: Queen Maria
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5347b/5347bfda9abdc3c45f3d4bfcc3fd36ea35fcb66f" alt=""
Even during her upbringing, Queen Maria, as a member of European aristocracy, developed a poised and elegant fashion style, which in our environment was kindly interpreted as an expression of modesty. Thus, at the beginning of 1941, in the magazine “Nedeljne ilustracije,” Queen’s visit to a charitable book exhibition was recounted, during which she, modestly groomed and even more modestly dressed, left speechless luxuriously dressed ladies from the best Belgrade houses. However, documentation related to the procurement of Queen’s clothing, preserved in the Archives of Yugoslavia in Belgrade, shows that she, in line with her status as the wife of a ruler, purchased clothing from leading Parisian haute couture houses such as Worth, Redfern, Drecoll, Patou, Martial & Armand, and Lelong. Queen Maria’s wedding dress was tailored at the Maison Nouvelle fashion salon in Bucharest, along with several other ceremonial dresses she brought with her upon her arrival in Belgrade in 1922. Queen Maria’s mother, Queen Maria of Romania, was also considered a style icon, and when it comes to fashion, one should not overlook the fact that Romania is one of the countries with a long and rich tradition of clothing, which occupied an important place in the public representation of elite social strata. Since she shared the same name as her mother, the Yugoslav queen was also known by the nickname Minyon (Mignon). During the interwar period, fur clothing was an obligatory part of women’s wardrobes. Queen Maria purchased fur in Paris, and it is known that in 1927, she bought a Siberian squirrel coat at the famous Belgrade shop of Đura Janošević, located on Knez Mihailova Street, at the site of today’s bookstore in the building of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. In 1922 and 1923, she ordered a ceremonial velvet coat with ermine and 13 evening dresses made of velvet, lame, and lace, in black, gray, beige, gold, red, pink, and green, as well as in strawberry and fuchsia colors from the fashion house Redfern. From this fashion house, in 1926, the queen received two boxes of toiletries, and during her stay in Paris in 1928, she ordered 13 dresses in gray, white, and beige from Redfern, including models Ole, Artemia, Fantasque, and Come Again, as well as gray and white sweaters, a coat, and an astrakhan fur coat. Two coats, an astrakhan set, fox fur, and one fur were acquired by the queen from Redfern in 1930. Interestingly, for a while, the talented Belgrade tailor Katarina Mladenović, active in the 1920s and known for her models adorned with various ornaments, worked for the fashion house Redfern. Mladenović executed these ornaments with an original technique she devised and patented, painting the fabric with melted metals and synthetic gemstones. The Redfern house was not only recognizable for its luxurious creations intended for members of high society. This house is significant in the history of fashion as a pioneer in the production of clothing tailored to the needs of modern women and outdoor activities such as walking, driving cars, playing tennis, cycling, or equestrian sports. Queen Maria herself was an excellent driver and a great lover of driving. She primarily ordered practical clothing from the fashion house Patou. In 1926, the queen bought a Caprice dress and a white felt hat from Patou, while the same year, a package of clothes was delivered to her in Belgrade by the Orient Express train from this fashion house. A representative of Patou, Miss Rišar (Richard), came to Belgrade in 1927 to receive new orders from Queen Maria. Also, three packages with sports costumes for the queen arrived in 1925 from London. In the fashion house Worth, the oldest Parisian haute couture house, Queen Maria bought an evening dress made of lame with a cloak and fur in 1934. That same year, after the assassination of King Alexander in Marseille, she ordered mourning attire from this fashion house – a crepe de chine dress, an afternoon coat, two hats, two veils, a Roman dress, and a Roman cloak. Numerous preserved photographs and painted portraits testify to the elegance of Queen Maria, who was exceptionally beloved and respected by the people. Draginja Maskareli Museum Adviser – Art and Fashion Historian Pictures:
Fashion Icons of the Past: Queen Natalija
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4155e/4155eaf54d179fe1483b78c2b68735b3c4fed103" alt=""
Serbian Queen Natalija had a deep love for fashion. Despite facing criticism from many in Serbia, including King Milan, for her penchant for luxury, she was considered a fashion icon of her time, with a significant following among women. After her exile from Serbia in 1891, a dress she left behind was reportedly preserved as a cult item in the home of the Belgrade Women’s Society. The most well-known and representative visual depiction of Queen Natalija is the portrait from 1882 painted by Vlaho Bukovac, which is displayed in the National Museum of Serbia. In this portrait, the queen is dressed in a sumptuous turn-of-the-century gown, in line with European fashion trends of the 1870s and 1880s. Evolving from crinolines that spread the lower part of the dress around the body, the “turnir” was a support structure worn at the back to expand only the rear part of the skirt. The fashion of this period was characterized by decorative elements such as ribbons, trimmings, elastic fabrics, and pleats, while the materials used for the turnir included cushions filled with horsehair, tightly starched fabric, and frames made of bones, bamboo, and rattan. Vlaho Bukovac recollected in his memoirs a conversation with Queen Natalija regarding her intention to be presented in a “turnir” gown. On that occasion, she expressed her dislike for elaborate national costumes, which she thought involved too much jewelry and ornaments. By preferring fashion over national attire, Queen Natalija, emphasizing her fashion-conscious image, directly participated in reshaping the public representation of the ruler’s wife, which was significantly different from the previous norms. Historically, the central aspect of the official representation of the wives of Serbian rulers, especially in the cases of Princess Persida and Queen Natalija, was lavish headgear and jewelry, including large brooches. Another portrait of Queen Natalija, painted by Uroš Predić in 1890, attracted public attention when it appeared at an auction at Bonhams in London in 2008. In this portrait, set in the queen’s private salon-boudoir, various carefully selected interior elements played a crucial role in constructing the image. Oriental carpets and Pirot kilims, books, domestic and foreign newspapers, a photograph of Crown Prince Alexander, an icon of the Virgin Mary, a palm tree, and a samovar were all featured. It is possible that this portrait, for which Queen Natalija wrote in 1904 that it should be sent to the writer Pierre Loti in Istanbul, was intended as a gift. Following her divorce from King Milan in 1891, Queen Natalija lived in Biarritz, at Villa Sashino. Here, she organized social gatherings and hosted prominent figures from the political, social, and artistic spheres. She wrote to geologist and politician Jovan Žujović in 1897 and 1898 that she was at the center of social events, leading a high-society life. In 1897, the British fashion magazine The Queen, which regularly reported on high society women, announced that Queen Nathalie of Servia had purchased numerous chef d’oeuvres in the Paris branch of the Redfern fashion house. This renowned fashion house later supplied clothing to the Yugoslav queen, Maria. It is interesting to note that the only high-fashion item in Serbian museum collections was created in the Paris branch of the Redfern fashion house. This is an evening gown worn by Elena Ristić at her engagement party in Paris in 1909. The dress was featured in the prestigious French fashion magazine Les Modes in the same year, in both the July and November issues, and is now part of the collection of the Museum of Applied Arts in Belgrade. Draginja Maskareli Museum Advisor – Art and Fashion Historian Images: Vlaho Bukovac, Queen Natalija, 1882; Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED / National Museum of Serbia Queen Natalija; Photo: Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED / Museum of Rudnik and Takovo Area Princess Julija, circa 1865, National Museum of Serbia; Photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain Uroš Predić, Queen Natalija, 1890; Photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain Evening Gown, Redfern fashion house, Les Modes magazine, Paris, July 1909; Photo: Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain / Gallica Digital Library